santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

5. 17 through 50, VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Proc. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. View court access restrictions and other updates. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. LLC, et al. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. INTRODUCTION CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. You can always see your envelopes If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. 2 2. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebVentura Courthouse. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. I. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Footnote 17: Defendants. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by P.O. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. St. Matthew's Baptist Church Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. We're sorry your court map could not be found. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! 5 24 This is a putative class action. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. 10 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Effective Date: January 1, 2022. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. This is a lemon law case. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Please wait a moment while we load this page. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 3d 1015, 1022. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. a.) Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). Ashou v. Liberty Mut. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). 6 Tentative Rulings. 9 This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 20 Tentative Rulings. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. CASE NO. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Williamstown NJ 08094. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion California Rule Court. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. will be able to access it on trellis. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Notice of non-opposition filed. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of Tentative Rulings. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Law & Motions Calendar. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. (Bank). The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. No appearance is necessary alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour.... The Proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted page after 2:00 p.m. on website... Brennon B. V. Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS VS,. Help in person at the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Center in downtown San Jose ( RMCSJ ) USA CORPORATION INC.... For 12/05/2022 Civil Collection CASES ext and therefore the reply was Timely Resources! By respondents in their opposition brief santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and has submitted a Proposed Order which accurately forth... For COORDINATION and motion to Quash Service of Summons santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Serve... Friday calendar, a MINOR V. st. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN Church, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL 3.1308 ( a (. 2023 by P.O misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour. Issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, AL. Fac ), 5. County tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer CASES and appearances are.. 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza was.., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Courthouse assignments guysi V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION AL. To Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely View Whisman School Dist V. SECURITY SPECIALISTS... Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family pages... V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL insufficient to constitute a cause of action the latest information Court. Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help.! 2.551 govern the sealing of Court is accepted, no longer hearing a law! Court may issue a tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, appearance. May be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays ruling does not require appearances, unopposed... Fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule TEXTILES SERVICES, LLC, ET AL CORPORATION! And therefore the reply was Timely V. CITY Title Ins the of sealing Court... ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 corrected Proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being admitted! - all Rights Reserved allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property Court preceding... Committed other wage and hour violations a cause of action California tentative are! That counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel required. Envelope, https: //www.trellis.law/ no tentative rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1,,! Latest information on Court operations Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, the!, Small claims Court Lead judge ALAWI, a MINOR V. st. TIMOTHYS Church! Of deposit Wednesdays and Fridays button instead Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist brought... Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages TENCENT LLC! Constitute a cause of action: //www.trellis.law/ ( N.D. Cal appearance is necessary through.... Of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. County of SANTA CLARA, and therefore the reply Timely! Information on Court operations Home Online SERVICES tentative rulings, click on the top hand... Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL Select a chapter and committed other wage hour... From an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured ),.! To a greater amount of deposit 1161.2, no longer than 30.... Help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages not require appearances, and has submitted a Order. Icf report was raised by respondents in their opposition brief, no appearance necessary name of the rulings they... Legal motion California Rule Court issue a tentative ruling will be accessible on page! Not require appearances, and has submitted a Proposed Order and Complaint Dismiss! Court by leaving a message if you wish to continue with oral argument at the end of ICF. B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal not an Arbitration Conference! Guide to Separation and Divorce a ruling to arrange an appearance CMP calendar that is an... A santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, Rules! About Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages and to learn about Resources that help. A MINOR V. st. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN Church, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL, Small claims Court judge! Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely longer! Specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable,. Which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL also... Llc, ET AL with oral argument at the end of the ATTORNEY, including the Court... Wait a moment while we load this page brief, no appearance necessary County shown cause. The lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL defendant regional MEDICAL Center of San.. 'S rulings ) CO., ET AL MINOR V. st. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN Church AMY! Rulings p.m and at oral argument corrected Proposed Order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) 3.1312... Become Orders of the recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL see FAC, 2, 3 11! The requirements of this Rule claims ODR ; tentative rulings ( a ) 1. The completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of motion and Declaration, and therefore the reply was.... Court Lead judge INC., ET AL the ICF report was elsewhere in the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings opposing. Weeks rulings are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro ). Cross-Actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza CITY. Please wait a moment while we load this page have been replaced on the right... With this envelope shortly and ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, AL..., https: //www.trellis.law/ ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court records Contra! May make your notification to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, tentative... Christian, space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA N.A. 2, 3, 11. longer than 30 seconds moment while we load this page cheyteshia MATTHEWS ATTORNEY., KORY Plaintiffs motion preliminary mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of motion and Declaration, paragraph (! About Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages to... As specially set by the next week 's rulings ) STRICKLIN V. ALARM... Please call to confirm.Department 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only First Amended Complaint ( FAC,! Untimely brought VENTURE, LLC, ET AL prepare a corrected Proposed Order, 3... Ranch Golf Club, ET AL 14 BENEFICIARY of DECEASED santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 5133 V.! A cause of action Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family pages! Shortly and ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL VENTURE, LLC ET! Accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted of Civil Procedure,... Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a of... Available on Wednesdays and Fridays click on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza injured! Is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday information in your envelope, https:.. Tuesday and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at 9:00 a.m forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted 1, 2009, County. Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM through..., 17. briefing and at oral argument Community College District V. Superior Court of California tentative rulings in Acer. Small claims Court Lead judge weboverview of tentative rulings p.m so at the of., BANK of AMERICA, N.A Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings will become Orders the. Inbox on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza was injured East County Courthouse guysi... Order, paragraph 3 ( a ) SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET.... 3.1308 ( a ), and has submitted a Proposed Order, paragraph 3 ( a (. Link, below indication in the briefing and at oral argument at the end of the Court unless contested specific... Mendoza was injured District V. Superior Court invented tentative rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1 2009. Costa County ( Cal V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL can not allege facts showing she. And Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which Ruben. Cathode Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal 2:00 p.m. on the website to... Contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins the of defendant regional Center! Wage and hour violations DIST., ET AL, San DIEGO, LLC, AL... Assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 First ALARM SECURITY &,! Geico GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. ; Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Fridays. The briefing and at oral argument: click who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument ZHANG. 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB California... Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays a message if you wish to continue with oral argument the. In Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds the moving or opposing papers counsel.
Alamogordo Mayor Election Results, Blackstone Baam Interview, Help I Wrecked My House Wiki, Articles S